Flight 93 Hoax

Saturday, February 09, 2008

Where'd the Fuselage Go?

Let's look at this photo again of the Shanksville crater:


Here's the best possible match of a Boeing 757 with the Shanksvile crater, given the official trajectory of inverted impact, with the plane traveling in the basic direction of the top of the photo:


Notice a wee problem?

Even if we assume the whole plane both blew up into tiny pieces or burrowed into the ground (as the official story holds), the fuselage would have had to have make some sort of crater in the ground where it hit. But there is nothing there where the fuselage should have hit.

This crater is nonsensical.

This is a nice companion diagram to my earlier proof regarding the Shanksville crater.

Also, note-- the measurements given in the diagram in the 2nd pic are rough and mainly for the purposes of trying to fit the plane in the crater. They probably do not represent the exact size of the crater. I have older posts for  measurements of the crater, and this one too. Precise measurements of the crater size are difficult though officially they've said 30 feet wide for the central crater. More problematic than the width of the crater is the overall shape and incredible lack of plane parts.