I Read the WingTV Book
Their basic scenario is that:
1) flight 93 crashed in New Baltimore after being shot down by the air force
2) the government hid this real crash site and created a fake crash site near Shanskville
3) the plane was going so fast that it was only a few seconds from Shanksville to New Baltimore, so it was possible to fake the Shanksville crash site
4) the Shanksville crash site was created by a missile, which one witness saw flying (forget her name, but she saw a weird white jet going overhead around the time of the crash)
5) flight 93 was real
Their BIG 9/11 scenario is that the whole 9/11 plan by the government was screwed up by flight 93 leaving late from Newark Airport. This is actually Dave McGowan's idea-- that flight 93 leaving late ruined the Washington DC attack part of the plan (DC was supposed to get hit by two planes at the same time as NYC, thus creating a rationale why there was no air defense).
The WingTV folks don't say much about the hijackings, or remote control, but they definitely seem to believe there was a real flight 93. They don't say what was really on flight 93 that the government needed to cover-up.
I think their basic logic is that if flight 93 had left on time, then DC would have been hit early and there would have been no air defense. But because flight 93 left late, and because flight 93 was supposed to coordinate with flight 77, the Pentagon attack got altered (though they don't say what DID happen at the Pentagon). Thus, according to the WingTV people, there was SOME air defense that eventually got to flight 93 and shot it down.
The problem for me here is that it is not clear that even early attacks on DC would have led to a virtual stand-down for the air force. This is one reason I like the no-plane idea better.
But my main question is--- why on EARTH would government plotters (or terrorists for that matter) rest their whole evil plan (i.e., they had to hit DC first to insure no air defense) on A PLANE LEAVING ON TIME FROM NEWARK AIRPORT???????!!!!!